How to Build a Student Project Around UX of Retail Product Pages During Big Deals

Hook: Turn deal-season browsing into measurable learning — fast

Students, teachers and lifelong learners: if you struggle to find retail UX projects that are current, measurable and career-relevant, this brief solves that. Big-deal windows (Prime Day-style events, post-holiday clearances, and the early-2026 promotions we saw across monitors, robot vacs and smart lamps) create concentrated traffic surges that let you measure real conversion behavior quickly. Build a course-grade or portfolio-ready project that analyzes how discounted product pages convert browsers into buyers — with concrete metrics, sample A/B tests, data sources and a reproducible deliverable.

The project at a glance (what you’ll deliver)

• Objective: Evaluate UX elements on discounted product pages and quantify which changes increase conversion and revenue during big-deal windows.
• Product focus: One each from monitors (high-ticket), robot vacuums (mid-high), and smart lamps (low-mid).
• Deliverables: Research brief, funnel / analytics dashboard, 2–4 A/B test plans, one executed A/B test (or simulated analysis), final report and slide deck with recommendations.
• Tools: GA4/BigQuery or server-side analytics, Looker Studio, Hotjar/Clarity, product price trackers (Keepa/Keepa-like for Amazon), and an A/B platform (Optimizely, VWO or open-source alternatives).

Why this matters in 2026: recent trends that make the project timely

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw three retail shifts that change how discounted product pages behave and how you should test them:

• Longer deal windows and dynamic promotions. Retailers are stretching discounts across weeks (not just single-day events), increasing exposure to different buyer intent segments.
• Cookieless measurement + server-side analytics adoption. First-party and server-side event tracking replaced much third-party cookie reliance — so students should use GA4, server endpoints or synthetic datasets for accurate funnel capture.
• AI-driven personalization and creative optimization. Merchants now use generative models to create badges, descriptions and hero images dynamically — which changes how to interpret A/B tests (is the variant human-authored or AI-generated?).

Project scope & timeline (6–8 weeks course-friendly)

1. Week 1: Select products, gather baseline analytics and document hypotheses.
2. Week 2: Map UX funnel and instrument analytics (or obtain dataset snapshots).
3. Week 3: Run qualitative research (heuristic review, heatmaps, session replays) and competitor scans.
4. Week 4–5: Design and launch 1–2 A/B tests (or run backtest simulation using historical data).
5. Week 6: Analyze results, produce dashboard, and prepare recommendations and final presentation.

Data sources & search tools (the content-pillar link)

Because this brief centers on “search tools and alerts,” include a step to collect real-time and historical signals about price and availability:

• Price trackers: Keepa, CamelCamelCamel (Amazon), and Honey price history snapshots to show discount depth and duration.
• Alerts and monitoring: Google Alerts, Talkwalker Alerts, and product-specific RSS feeds to capture promotion announcements.
• Traffic & UX signals: GA4 for page events, Microsoft Clarity or Hotjar for heatmaps & session replay, and Semrush/SimilarWeb for competitive traffic estimates.
• Ecommerce dashboards: Shopify/Magento or Amazon Seller/Central reports if your dataset includes merchant-provided data.

What to measure — metrics that matter

Focus on both conversion outcomes and the behavioral signals that explain them. For discounted items you should track:

• Macro conversions: Conversion rate (visits > purchase), revenue per visit (RPV), average order value (AOV), units per transaction.
• Micro conversions: Add-to-cart rate, checkout-start rate, click-throughs on promotions/badges, video plays, review-clicks.
• Engagement & persuasion: Time on page, scroll depth (how far users reach product details), image/video engagement, review-read rate.
• Urgency & scarcity signals: Clicks on countdown timer, interactions with stock level indicator, conversion lifts during visible low-stock states.
• Post-purchase signals: Refund/return rate for discounted SKUs, repeat purchase rate, margin impact per transaction.

Suggested KPI targets (classroom baseline)

• Baseline CVR for desktop product pages: 2–4% (varies by category)
• Target uplift per successful UX change: +10–30% relative CVR
• AOV increase target for bundles/upsell tests: +8–20%
• Time-on-page increase for richer media: +15–40%

Sample A/B tests — hypotheses, variations, and why they matter

Here are focused, testable experiments tailored to discounted items. Each includes the hypothesis, what to measure and expected trade-offs.

Test 1 — Price prominence vs. contextual savings

Hypothesis: Prominently displaying the percent-off badge and original price increases add-to-cart rates more than showing only the sale price.

• Variant A (control): Sale price only, small “sale” badge.
• Variant B: Large % off badge + struck-through original price + “You save $X” text near CTA.
• Metrics: Add-to-cart rate, CVR, average time on page, bounce.
• Why it matters: For high-ticket items (monitors, robot vacs) the perceived savings can overcome friction.

Test 2 — Countdown urgency vs. no timer

Hypothesis: A live countdown timer (showing deal expiry) increases conversion during high-traffic deal windows but may increase returns if buyers rush.

• Metric trade-offs: CVR vs. post-purchase returns and CS inquiries.
• Segment tests: Run separately for new vs returning visitors; urgency often helps new visitors more.

Test 3 — Reviews-first vs. features-first layout

Hypothesis: For discounted commodity items (smart lamps), surfacing top-rated review snippets above the fold increases conversions more than feature lists.

• Variant: Highlight 3 review snippets + average rating vs. no review summary.
• Measure: CVR, review click-through, time to purchase.

Test 4 — Bundled savings vs. single-item discount

Hypothesis: Offering a discounted bundle (lamp + accessory) lifts AOV and revenue per visit more than increasing single-item discount depth.

• Metrics: AOV, units per transaction, margin per visit.
• Why: Bundles reduce discounting pressure while increasing cart size — useful for mid-ticket robot vacuums with accessory upsells.

Sample statistical plan & sample size guidance

Teach students the reality: many UX experiments fail from insufficient traffic. Use Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE) planning before launching.

• Rule of thumb: If baseline CVR is 3%, detecting a 10% relative lift (0.3% absolute) typically requires tens of thousands of visitors per variation. Low-traffic pages may need simulated backtests or pooled experiments across categories.
• Quick sample-size example: Baseline p=0.03, want 10% relative uplift (p2=0.033). With 80% power and alpha 0.05, you’ll often need ~40k–80k visits per arm depending on exact formula.
• Practical alternatives for students: run longer-duration tests, increase effect size asks (e.g., test bold visual changes that could produce 20–30% lifts), or use retrospective analysis on historical deal spikes.

How to instrument analytics (practical checklist)

1. Define events: page_view_product, add_to_cart, begin_checkout, purchase, review_click, gallery_click, timer_click.
2. Implement server-side event capture or GA4 with enhanced measurement; validate events in real-time via debug view.
3. Track UTM parameters / traffic source to separate deal-campaign traffic vs organic discovery.
4. Wire heatmaps & session replay for a representative sample of sessions during the deal window.
5. Log price history and discount change events (e.g., when price drops from $1,099 to $639) to correlate behavior to price movements.

Qualitative research — what to look for on discounted pages

Numbers tell you what happened; qualitative signals tell you why. Have students perform:

• Heuristic review: Evaluate clarity of value prop, scarcity cues, return policy clarity, and trust badges.
• Usability test (5–8 users): Ask users to find the best deal and complete a purchase; observe confusion points.
• Heatmap analysis: Do users ignore the promo badge? Are reviews read before the CTA?
• Session replay readouts: Watch scroll and click sequences to identify friction during the deal window.

Case-study examples (use recent 2026 deal stories as teaching moments)

Use real-world headlines from early 2026 to frame your product selections. For example:

• Samsung 32" Odyssey monitor at ~42% off (example for high-ticket monitor testing: price prominence and financing offers)
• Dreame X50 Ultra robot vacuum heavily discounted (example for bundling accessories, urgency timers, and review-first vs feature-first layouts)
• Govee RGBIC smart lamp discounted under standard lamp prices (example for social proof prominence and cross-sell of smart-home accessories)

Use these public deal snapshots to reconstruct realistic price-change timelines and to bootstrap promotion-event test scenarios.

Analysis & reporting — what to include in the final deliverable

Your final report should contain:

• Executive summary with clear recommendations and expected business impact (RPV, CVR lift).
• Data visualizations: funnel conversion, A/B test graphs with confidence intervals, heatmaps, and price timeline overlays.
• Segmented results: mobile vs desktop, new vs returning, paid vs organic traffic.
• Limitations and validity checks: seasonality, overlapping campaigns, sample size caution.
• Next steps & roadmap: additional tests, personalization ideas, and staging for store-wide rollout.

Ethics, privacy and reproducibility

Teach students to respect privacy and platform terms:

• Don’t scrape private or rate-limited endpoints. Use public price-tracker APIs or permitted feeds.
• Obtain consent for any usability testing with real users and anonymize datasets for sharing.
• Document instrumentation so instructors can reproduce or validate findings (event schema, sample windows, and randomization method).

Grading rubric (quick teacher template)

• Research & hypotheses (20%): Clear background, realistic hypotheses tied to metrics.
• Instrumentation & data quality (20%): Correct events, validation and data-cleaning steps documented.
• A/B test design (20%): Proper control, ethical randomization, sample-size logic and metric selection.
• Analysis & insights (25%): Statistical reasoning, segmented insights and business impact estimation.
• Presentation & reproducibility (15%): Clear deliverables, reproducible files and next-step roadmap.

Advanced strategies and future-proofing (2026+)

Push stronger analytical skills by adding these advanced components:

• Server-side A/B testing: Reduces client-side flicker and improves measurement in cookieless contexts.
• Bayesian vs frequentist: Teach both approaches; Bayesian credible intervals often communicate results better to stakeholders.
• Personalization experiments: Test rule-based vs AI-driven creative variations and measure downstream retention (not just immediate CVR).
• Counterfactual revenue impact: Use holdout groups to measure cannibalization and long-term margin effects from heavy discounts.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Running tests during external traffic spikes without proper segmentation (ads change test exposure).
• Peeking early at results; apply pre-registered analysis plans and stop criteria.
• Overfitting on one product; replicate across categories (monitor vs lamp) to validate generalizability.
• Neglecting returns and post-purchase metrics — instant conversion can mask long-term losses.

Actionable next steps (for students and instructors)

1. Pick your three products and snapshot price history (use Keepa or equivalent) to document discount depth and timeline.
2. Instrument your analytics and collect a one-week baseline before any variant launch.
3. Design one visual A/B test (price prominence or countdown) and one behavioral test (bundle or reviews-first).
4. Run tests for a pre-planned duration (or simulate if traffic is low), analyze with confidence intervals, and document results.

Final thoughts

Discounted product pages are a rich lab for student UX and ecommerce analytics work in 2026. They combine pricing psychology, measurable funnels and the need to account for modern measurement realities (cookieless tracking, server-side events, AI creative). With real deal examples from early 2026 — monitors with massive markdowns, high-ticket robot vacuums and cheap smart lamps — your class can generate insights that hiring managers in retail UX and growth teams will understand and value.

Call to action

Ready to build this project? Download the one-page project template and sample dataset (instructor-ready) or sign up for the student cohort walkthrough. Use this brief as your syllabus backbone and start measuring real conversion impact today — then present results that hiring managers will remember.

Related Reading

• I Can’t Make It — I’m Hosting a Cocktail Night: Playful Excuses to Cancel Plans
• Gaming Monitor Discounts: Which LG and Samsung Models Are Worth the Drop?
• Video Micro-lesson: Handling High-Stakes Scenes in TTRPGs — Lessons from ‘Blood for Blood’
• Lighting Secrets for Better Wig Photos: How Smart Lamps Transform Your Content
• Boots Opticians' New Campaign: A Case Study in Positioning Retail Services as One-Stop Wellness Hubs